Explain the importance of comparability groups in epidemiological studies 1. It can therefore partially or entirely account for an apparent effect. Evaluation of confounding in epidemiologic studies. It was first expressed as an issue of group noncomparability, later as an uncontrolled fallacy, then as a controllable fallacy named confounding, and, more recently, as an issue of group noncomparability in the distribution of potential outcome types. Over the past few years, there have been a growing number of studies outlining both harmful and potentially protective effects of alcohol consumption on the risk of various healthrelated outcomes, including ischemic heart disease 1,2,3,4,5,6,7. Criteria for confounders in epidemiological studies. Confounding accounting for the multicausal nature of disease secondary associations and their control introduction when modern epidemiology developed in the 1970s, olli miettinen organized sources of bias into three major categories.
Diagram the relationship of a confounder with exposure and outcome. Confounding in a study of whether factor a is a risk factor for disease b, x is a confounder if. Given that few metaepidemiological studies control for confounding due to other features of trial design e. Generally, epidemiologic studies are directed at answering questions about healthrelated events. Confounding factor an overview sciencedirect topics. Pdf confounding variables in epidemiologic studies. Assistant professor school of pharmacy, national taiwan university 30th annual meeting of the international society for pharmacoepidemiology taipei, taiwan october 23, 2014 1. Confounding control in healthcare database research. Many of these studies, which have gained widespread attention in the media 8, 9, have the potential to influence consumer behavior and can. To study the concept of a confounder analytically, the idea of an irrelevant factor is also required.
The bias can be negativeresulting in underestimation of the exposure effector positive, and can even reverse the apparent direction of effect. Basics and beyond farin kamangar md1,2 authors afliations. The existence of confounding variables in smoking studies. A confounding factor is defined as a variable other than the predictor variables that potentially affects the outcome variable 21. This latest development synthesised the apparent disconnect between. This chapter discusses epidemiological study designs and other important aspects of the studies to help readers better interpret the observed associations. Methodological issues of confounding in analytical epidemiologic. In this context, confounding is described as a mixing of extraneous factor called. Appropriate adjustment for confounding in such studies is challenging because exposure is determined by a complex interaction of patient, physician, and. Information on known or suspected confounding characteristics is collected to evaluate and control confounding during the analysis. Selection bias measurement bias confounding the control of confounding validity ethical issues study questions references chapter 4 basic biostatistics. Adjusting for confounding by indication in observational studies. Instrumental variables to control confounding have been used in econometrics for decades but may also be useful in epidemiological studies to control confounding. Confoundingfor confounding to occur, the confounders should bedifferentially represented in the comparison groups.
Association between an exposure and outcome is misestimated due to the failure to account for a third factor the confounder 9 consider association observed between carrying matches. Confounding by indication in epidemiologic studies of. Epidemiological studies measure the risk of illness or death in an exposed population compared to that risk in an identical, unexposed population for example, a population the same age, sex, race and social status as the exposed population. Confounding in epidemiology young epidemiology scholars. A variable that a is causally related to the disease under study. Confounding by linkage disequilibrium journal of human. History of the modern epidemiological concept of confounding. Confounding and other concerns in metaepidemiological. Confounding, sometimes referred to as confounding bias, is mostly described as a mixing or blurring of effects. In the design of casecontrol studies, matching is a technique that is used to prevent. Pdf as confounding obscures the real effect of an exposure on outcome, investigators. If there is an association, the exposure is called a risk factor of. Confounding factor definition of confounding factor by. When present, it results in a biased estimate of the effect of exposure on disease.
Confounding by known factors can be addressed through study. Although confounding is commonly referenced in research, it is often misunderstood. Analytical epidemiological study is a quantitative, comparative study investigating the relationship between a study factor and an outcome. To estimate the effect of x on y, the statistician must suppress the effects of extraneous variables that influence both x and y. Because the allocation of treatment in observational studies is not randomized and the indication for treatment may be related to the risk of future health outcomes, the resulting imbalance in the underlying risk profile between treated and comparison groups can generate biased. Indirect adjustment for confounding by smoking resulted in an 18% decrease in the adjusted estimated hazard ratio, yet this cannot be verified because smoking was unmeasured. The issue of confounding in epidemiological studies of ambient air pollution and pregnancy outcomes matthew j. Checkoway h, waldman gt 1985 assessing the possible extent of confounding in occupational casereferent studies. Confounding is one of the three types of bias that may affect epidemiologic studies. Basics and beyond article pdf available in archives of iranian medicine 158.
Criteria for confounders in epidemiological studies zhi geng, peking university, beijing, peoples republic of china. Among published studies of relationships between ambient air pollution and adverse pregnancy outcomes, the most common analytic approach has been spatialtemporal. Let x be some independent variable, y some dependent variable. As most medical studies attempt to investigate disease. Let us assume a cohort study was designed to determine the association. Bias, confounding and fallacies in epidemiology authorstream. Confounding occurs when an extraneous factor, or a set of factors, can at least partially explain an apparent association or a lack of an apparent association between a. Principles of causality in epidemiological research. You will learn how to understand and differentiate commonly used terminologies in epidemiology, such as chance, bias and confounding, and suggest measures to mitigate them. Full text confounding in observational studies based on. We say that x and y are confounded by some other variable z whenever z causally influence both x and y. The epidemiological concept of confounding has had a convoluted history. Find, read and cite all the research you need on researchgate.
Confounding to be a confounding factor, two conditions must be met. Confounding by indication is a bias frequently encountered in observational epidemiologic studies of drug effects. The interpretation of study findings or surveys is subject to debate, due to the possible errors in measurement which might influence the results. In the first section the paper compares some definitions of a confounder given in the demographic and epidemiological literature with the definition of a confounder as a common cause of. Confounding by indication is a special type of confounding that can occur in observational nonexperimental pharmacoepidemiologic studies of the effects and side effects of drugs. Epidemiologic studies are increasingly used to investigate the safety and effectiveness of medical products and interventions. The issue of confounding in epidemiological studies of. Epidemiological studies show a statistical association between exposure to magnetic fields and childhood leukaemia. This type of confounding arises from the fact that individuals who are prescribed a medication or who take a given medication are inherently different from those. Assessment and indirect adjustment for confounding by. Assumptions underlying this method are described, and a causespecific proportional hazards model that allows easy implementation using standard software is presented. Confounding occurs when another exposure exists in the study population and is associated with both the disease and the exposure being studied when the effects of two exposures risk factors have not been separated, and incorrect conclusions are drawn that the.
A confounding variableis a variable say, pollution that can cause the disease under study cancer and is also associated with the exposure of interest smoking. Confounding should always be addressed in studies concerned with causality. Confounding is defined in terms of the data generating model as in the figure above. Role of chance, bias and confounding in epidemiological. Epidemiologic study types have their roots in the concepts of scientific experimenta tion. A confounding factor is a variable that is correlated with both the exposure and the outcome under study. Statistical methods try to deal with consequences retrospectively can we achieve comparability by study design. Many epidemiologic studies are planned to examine the causal association of.
This two to threeday long unit will provide students an elementary understanding of confounding, one of the major problems of nonexperimental research. Dana flanders3, adolfo correa2, michele marcus3, and paige e. This work is licensed under a creative commons attribution. Confounding in epidemiological studies health knowledge. Tolbert1 1department of environmental and occupational health, rollins school of public health, emory university, atlanta, usa. A simple definition of confounding is the confusion of effects. Summary of epidemiological studies experimental epidemiology randomized controlled trials field trials community trials potential errors in epidemiological studies. An epidemiological study wishes to investigate the e to d relationship, but the e. Full text adjusting for confounding by indication in. Confounding occurs when a confounding variable, c, is associated with the exposure, e, and also influences the disease outcome, d. Observational studies are particularly susceptible to the effects of chance, bias and confounding, and these need to be considered at both the design and analysis stage of an epidemiological study so that their effects can be minimized. Any risk factor for a disease is a potential confounder. Epidemiology studies tend to produce graphs and charts for data analysis and presentation.
Confounding factors epidemiology subject areas on research. Is that causal magnetic fields cause leukaemia or is it confounding something else, the confounding factor, causes leukaemia, but happens to be associated with magnetic. Situation in which c may confound the affect of the e to d. It is a concern no matter what the design of the study or what statistic is. Randomisation is an attempt to evenly distributepotential unknown confounders in study groups. Criteria for confounders in epidemiological studies ucla cs. Occurs in nature, not due to study design or execution. Observational studies design of epidemiologic studies laura lee johnson, ph. Analytical studies often assess the effect of potential causes of disease, pathogenic mechanisms, risk factors, prognostic factors, or remedial therapies. Observational studies design of epidemiologic studies. Farin kamangar morgan state university 157 publications 5,679 citations see profile available from. Identify three criteria a variable must fulfill to be a confounder in an epidemiological study 2. It is associated with factor a but is not a result of exposure to factor a. Cnribim clinical epidemiology and pathophysiology of renal diseases and hypertension, renal.
995 1311 272 788 1190 1083 1166 1178 295 1270 975 56 47 602 1194 1454 657 6 1351 1188 349 973 1365 175 1189 701 995 315 585 495 582